while both examples, would be correct, i think a have something to say about them
"is" is stating a fact, something IS a fact. would be, to me, says that there's something else missing, a hidden variable, for example:
"it would be dangerous to drive a car after drinking two bottles of whiskey.....
....which is why you shouldn't do it
.....so you sould get someone to drive you
.....unless you have a high alcohol tolerence"
to me "would be" implies something else, while "is " is the end the and definitive.
anymany
while both examples, would be correct, i think a have something to say about them
"is" is stating a fact, something IS a fact. would be, to me, says that there's something else missing, a hidden variable, for example:
"it would be dangerous to drive a car after drinking two bottles of whiskey.....
....which is why you shouldn't do it
.....so you sould get someone to drive you
.....unless you have a high alcohol tolerence"
to me "would be" implies something else, while "is " is the end the and definitive.
Precipitation24
That is a novel definition. I learned something new.